Redefining The Breatharian
According to Wikipedia
Breatharianism is a related concept, in which believers claim food and possibly water are not necessary, and that humans can be sustained solely by prana (the vital life force inHinduism), or, according to some, by the energy in sunlight (according to Ayurveda, sunlight is one of the main sources of prana). The terms breatharianism or inedia may also refer to this philosophy practised as a lifestyle in place of the usual diet.
(BREATH A-nd Re – aligning the I -As breath, as a-N organ-ISM in a world based on equality)
An alleged ability to live without food and water for short periods or longer periods – based on positive, neutral or negative experiences – through eating and/or not eating – trying to find out ‘the best’ diet – liking the ‘freedom’ one experiences without food – defined within the polarity of having food’ and ‘not having food’, ‘freedom and no freedom’ etc. – where the mind is feeding off the body to keep these energetic experiences going – as the ego-personality – in self-interest – in an unequal monetary system – where plants and animals are being killed for food and profit.
This is a limited definition, one that cannot be lived as an expression of who one is as equal to all that exist.
Realizes through ones process of self-perfection that one is equal to all that exist – as all came from the same substance all are made of -as the character standing equal to all that Is here,
*Redefines breatharianism as living without food and water – where one births oneself as a real character in flesh and blood – as the physical/substance – aware of itself – as equal to all that exist – as the air – as an expression equal to oneself – prefers to use air as nourishment – cross- referenced with/as all standing as life- for what is best for all.
Seeing the commonsense that ‘as within so without’, assists in establishing a world based on equality– lives as who one is – as the breath in every moment here – and lives without needing to kill animals and plants for food.
‘What is clear about words that are defined within and as self as polarized words, are that they are reactive in nature. Meaning when carrying a negatively or positively charged word within and as self, this polarity charged word will ‘react’ within its environment seeking out designs of ‘homeostasis’ or ‘winning’. The consequential outflows of negatively and positively charged words are predetermined in that they follow a specific pre-programmed path.
It is thus common sense to realize that, what we place as definitions within and as ourselves is what we manifest within the expression of ourselves. This is why we redefine words; to find the living expression evident in each word from the principle of oneness and equality. As we look at a word we are moving ourselves through the word to see what it represents and what it stands for as a living expression. By assigning a definition to the word we are developing our vocabulary by placing within the definitions, living definitions that stand free from polarity which are able to stand as living expressions of the words that we have redefined.’ ~ Taken from Earth’s Journey to Life Blog.
Guide for Redefining Words :